Security teams today operate with unprecedented levels of telemetry, yet many organizations remain behind adversaries who are scaling faster than traditional response models can manage. In 2025, organizations faced an average of 1,968 cyber attacks per week, marking an 18 percent year over year increase and nearly 70 percent growth since 2023. This rise is not merely an increase in background noise but an indication that attacker throughput is accelerating at a pace that outstrips human driven detection and response cycles. At the same time, the methods used by threat actors have shifted in ways that expose weaknesses in conventional defensive strategies. Social engineering has evolved beyond email based phishing into multi channel, cross platform campaigns. Techniques such as ClickFix manipulate users into executing malicious steps themselves through seemingly legitimate interactions like CAPTCHA prompts or verification workflows. Activity linked to ClickFix increased by roughly 500 percent and appeared in nearly half of documented malware campaigns, highlighting how attackers now embed execution within routine user behavior rather than relying solely on payload delivery.
Alongside the evolution of social engineering, volatility within the ransomware ecosystem has reshaped attacker strategy. In 2025, major ransomware as a service groups disappeared, rebranded, or were disrupted, only for new or revived actors to fill the gap. Qilin emerged as one of the most active operators of the year, publishing over 1,000 victims after recruiting displaced affiliates. At the same time, Cl0p exploited zero day and n day vulnerabilities in widely used enterprise file transfer and ERP software, driving mass compromise campaigns with high victim counts. LockBit resurfaced as LockBit 5.0, demonstrating how experienced operators can rebuild quickly even after infrastructure disruptions. These developments show that attackers rely on interchangeable tooling, affiliate migration, shared infrastructure, and rebranding cycles. In this environment, delays in patching, segmentation, identity hardening, or deploying compensating controls create persistent windows of opportunity, regardless of which ransomware brand dominates headlines.
The Exposure Management report frames the central issue as an action gap. Attackers, increasingly supported by automation and AI, can move from discovery to exploitation within hours, while organizations often require days or weeks to coordinate validation and remediation. Although enterprises identify thousands of exposures, only about half are remediated annually, with an average remediation time of 3.5 days. Meanwhile, security environments generate hundreds of millions of threat intelligence items and inspect billions of assets daily, making it difficult to distinguish urgent risks from theoretical findings. The result is a backlog where known weaknesses remain reachable and exploitable. Visibility has improved through expanded scanning, detection, and scoring, yet risk reduction has not kept pace. Long lists of findings, stale alerts, and issues labeled severe but not exploitable in context dilute focus and delay action.
Exposure Management is emerging not as another dashboard but as an operational model that connects external and internal signals, contextualizes real world exploitability, and drives validated, safe remediation. Rather than asking what should be fixed in theory, the approach centers on how to mitigate risk immediately using existing controls, whether through patches, compensating measures, segmentation, rapid takedowns of malicious pages, or leaked credential resets. A key principle is safe by design remediation, recognizing that patches and configuration changes can introduce outages. Validating fixes before enforcement, automating repeatable responses, favoring compensating controls when needed, and ensuring actions are reversible all reduce hesitation and shrink exposure dwell time. As attack surfaces expand across interconnected ecosystems and third party suppliers, and as deepfakes and conversational fraud challenge traditional trust models, reducing the window of exploitability becomes the defining metric. In this context, the real measure of resilience is not how much an organization can see, but how quickly and safely it can reduce exposure.
Follow the SPIN IDG WhatsApp Channel for updates across the Smart Pakistan Insights Network covering all of Pakistan’s technology ecosystem.
